Feb. 3, 2026

A Republic at War With Itself: Militarized Policing and the Slow Erosion of Civil Liberties

A Republic at War With Itself: Militarized Policing and the Slow Erosion of Civil Liberties

How decades of wars on crime, drugs, terror, and immigration militarized American policing and quietly reshaped how the constitution is understood

Over the past thirty-five years, the United States has quietly transformed its criminal-justice system into something resembling a permanent domestic battlefield.

In this episode, we trace how successive “wars” at home—the war on crime, the war on drugs, the war on terror, and the war on immigration—have steadily altered the relationship between the citizen and the state. Each was justified as temporary. None truly ended.

Drawing on constitutional history, crime data, and lived legal experience, this episode examines how fear replaced evidence as the engine of policy, even as violent crime fell dramatically across much of the country. The language of emergency survived the numbers that once justified it.

We explore how punishment displaced treatment, how surveillance migrated downward toward the poor and powerless, and how federal authority expanded deep into local policing. From welfare drug testing to armored vehicles on city streets, the tools and posture of war became normalized in everyday American life.

The episode also looks at what happened to the Bill of Rights under pressure—how guarantees of counsel, bail, due process, and protection from unreasonable searches were narrowed by exception, doctrine, and rhetoric. The Constitution remained on the page, but its reach shrank in practice.

Finally, we examine how immigration enforcement and the war on terror completed the turn inward, creating parallel systems of justice and “Constitution-lite” zones where ordinary protections fade. The result is not chaos, but something more troubling: a stable, militarized normal.

This is not a partisan argument. It is a structural one.

A republic that repeatedly declares war on its own internal enemies must eventually decide whether rights are promises—or obstacles.

👉Subscribe to The Mitten Channel

Join us for the full experience. Subscribe to The Mitten Channel on Substack to receive our latest narrative essays, audio stories, and deep-dive reporting directly in your inbox.

Explore Our Series:

  • Radio Free Flint: Narrative storytelling and community perspectives on industrial resilience.
  • The Mitten Works: Essential history and analysis of labor and economic policy.
  • Flint Justice: Critical insights into the legal and institutional challenges facing our state.

Visit our Mitten Channel website for our complete library of podcasts, videos, and articles.

The Mitten Channel is a production of Radio Free Flint Media, LLC. © 2026 All Rights Reserved.



Visit our website at www.radiofreeflint.media to subscribe to our free newsletter to receive our latest episodes.

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:13.119 --> 00:00:15.599
Hello, you're listening to Radio Free Flint.

00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:21.280
This is Arthur Bush, and today's episode is the militarization of the criminal justice system.

00:00:21.760 --> 00:00:37.920
Over roughly 35 years, the United States has lived through a series of wars at home on drugs, on crime, on terror, on the border, that they've all quietly rewritten a relationship between citizens and the state.

00:00:38.159 --> 00:00:41.759
Each was launched with the solemn promises of safety.

00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:45.200
Each left behind a larger apparatus of force.

00:00:45.359 --> 00:00:51.119
At the founding, the Bill of Rights was meant as a break on the very government the framers feared.

00:00:51.439 --> 00:01:05.040
People who felt persecuted by their own rulers wrote protections for speech, for counsel, for reasonable bail, and against unreasonable searches and seizures into the country's operating system.

00:01:05.280 --> 00:01:10.640
Those guarantees were supposed to endure whenever storms came after.

00:01:10.879 --> 00:01:21.200
In the late twentieth century, a new language entered American politics, largely coinciding with the presidency of Richard Millaus Nixon.

00:01:21.359 --> 00:01:26.879
Leaders began to speak of a war on crime, a war on drugs, a war on everything.

00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:31.519
In wartime they insisted ordinary rules could not apply.

00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:44.560
Wiretaps, warrantless arrests, denial of lawyers demonizing the ACLU and Defense Counsel, even the casual talk of the government's right to search your underwear drawer.

00:01:44.799 --> 00:01:48.959
That became part of an acceptable vocabulary of public life.

00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:56.239
Again and again, Americans were told that civil liberties were a luxury the country could no longer afford.

00:01:56.480 --> 00:02:06.560
In the name of safety, presidents and attorney generals asked the public to see the Bill of Rights not as a set of promises, but as a set of obstacles.

00:02:06.799 --> 00:02:09.039
So let's look at the numbers and the fear.

00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:14.240
By 1990s, something odd was happening beneath the rhetoric.

00:02:14.479 --> 00:02:18.960
Violent crime in the United States fell dramatically over the decade.

00:02:19.199 --> 00:02:23.039
Many categories of serious crime dropped off by half.

00:02:23.199 --> 00:02:27.520
The decline was even across neighborhoods and cities.

00:02:27.759 --> 00:02:29.680
But the trend was unmistakable.

00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:33.759
The images on the evening news told a different story.

00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:47.199
Night after night, viewers saw one more child abduction, one more body in the street, one more school shooting or armed robbery, and the local reporters would say if it bleeds, it bleeds.

00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:55.840
Night after night, viewers saw one more child abduction, one more body in the street, one more school shooting or armed robbery.

00:02:56.080 --> 00:03:07.039
Even after a sharp frightening spike in homicides during the pandemic years, serious violence fell back toward below its pre-COVID levels.

00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:13.680
Yet the political language of emergency survived the numbers that had once justified it.

00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:17.919
So how do we approach drug addicts during these periods?

00:03:18.240 --> 00:03:21.599
Or how do we approach the poor, better said?

00:03:21.759 --> 00:03:26.960
In the same era, national policy turned toward punishment rather than repair.

00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:32.800
Drug addiction was treated less as an illness to be treated than as a crime to be contained.

00:03:32.960 --> 00:03:41.199
The country knew that some European nations were experimenting with programs that emphasized treatment, harm reduction, and reintegration.

00:03:41.360 --> 00:03:46.879
The United States largely chose the cell, that is the jail cell.

00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:53.360
Eventually, that impulse reached people far from the stereotypical dealer.

00:03:53.599 --> 00:04:00.639
Welfare mothers, women without lobbyists, or campaign donations became the convenient targets.

00:04:00.800 --> 00:04:07.840
In many states, drug treatment and social support were replaced with mandatory drug testing regimes.

00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:13.039
No one pretended to have probable cause that each mother used drugs.

00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:15.199
Suspicion alone became enough.

00:04:15.439 --> 00:04:25.439
The same level of casual drug use in the corporate suites and white collar parts of our cities rarely produced such curiosity.

00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:28.800
This too was kind of militarization.

00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:35.519
That is the tools of surveillance and suspicion aimed downward at those least able to resist.

00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.920
Let's talk about federal power and the new domestic battlefield.

00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:49.680
As the 20th century closed and the 21st century began, the structure in law enforcement itself shifted.

00:04:49.759 --> 00:04:57.279
Some conservatives spoke the language of dual federalism, promising more power to states and localities.

00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:02.240
Yet in practice, federal authorities surged into local policing.

00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:05.920
As governor and then as president, George W.

00:05:06.079 --> 00:05:11.600
Bush supported expanding the reach of federal agents in everyday work of criminal justice.

00:05:11.839 --> 00:05:17.759
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, that expansion quickened.

00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:22.399
The war on terror gave federal agencies new mandates and new tools.

00:05:22.639 --> 00:05:26.800
Intelligence programs once aimed abroad were turned inward.

00:05:26.959 --> 00:05:34.399
The line between soldier and officer, between foreign battlefield and domestic street, that became harder to see.

00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:40.399
This was not only a matter of statutes and budgets, it was a matter of appearance and posture.

00:05:41.519 --> 00:05:50.240
Tactical gear, armored vehicles, and military surplus equipment became commonplace in city police departments.

00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:54.000
The visual vocabulary of war came home.

00:05:54.240 --> 00:06:04.319
Eventually we began to see police officers with military haircuts and masks on their face secreting their identity.

00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:06.639
Our constitution's under pressure.

00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:12.879
Even as this happened, a particular style of constitutional argument gained prominence.

00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:17.519
Some leaders called for a literal reading of the founding text.

00:06:17.680 --> 00:06:25.279
They warned against quote unquote activist judges who looked to history, purpose, or consequence.

00:06:25.519 --> 00:06:28.160
Yet the literalism was selective.

00:06:28.399 --> 00:06:36.800
The right to counsel, the guarantee of reasonable bail, the promise that no person would be deprived of liberty without due process.

00:06:37.279 --> 00:06:39.439
Yet the literalism was selective.

00:06:39.600 --> 00:06:49.839
The right to counsel, the guarantee of reasonable bail, the promise that no person would be deprived of liberty without due process were all written clearly.

00:06:50.079 --> 00:07:00.319
Nonetheless, new doctrines and practices carved out exceptions, especially for those labeled dangerous, foreign, or suspect.

00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:05.439
The document's words remained, each reach narrowed them.

00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:20.160
The same voices that insisted that the Second Amendment guaranteed expansive private rights to guns and other weapons were less certain that the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments meant quite what they said.

00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:28.399
The Bill of Rights, once treated as a shield for the accused, became for many a symbol of indulgence towards criminals.

00:07:28.560 --> 00:07:39.680
The exclusionary rule and its enemies for more than a century the exclusionary rule has stood as one of the few direct consequences for unconstitutional police behavior.

00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:50.160
Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, without a warrant, without probable cause, through egregious conduct could be suppressed.

00:07:50.399 --> 00:08:00.639
In the 1990s, as new conservative waves swept Congress and the state houses, some leaders proposed to end that rule.

00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:03.040
They called it a technicality.

00:08:03.199 --> 00:08:15.680
Others quietly understood what its abstinence meant, and if agents ever came searching their own drawers and desk, they might very well be the target.

00:08:15.920 --> 00:08:18.959
The rule survived, however, for the time being.

00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:24.399
The formal language of the Fourth Amendment still has practical remedies.

00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:27.759
Then came the war on terror and the Twilight Zone.

00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:32.639
The attacks of 2001 allowed longstanding tensions to surface.

00:08:32.799 --> 00:08:41.679
New laws and executing policies permitted the detention of citizens and non-citizens alike on broad suspicions.

00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:48.799
People could be held without charges, without lawyers, without bail, all in the name of security.

00:08:49.039 --> 00:08:52.320
Parallel justice systems emerged during this period.

00:08:52.639 --> 00:09:07.519
Military commissions, offshore detention centers in places like Cuba's Guantanamo Bay, and special regimes allowed cases to be handled outside the ordinary courts, namely military courts.

00:09:07.759 --> 00:09:17.279
The official explanation was that the existing system was too protective of rights, too slow, too fragile for the new age.

00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:24.240
What had been a set of external extraordinary tools for rare circumstances began to look more permanent.

00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:29.039
Each new exception to the Constitution justified the next.

00:09:29.279 --> 00:09:34.080
So now we have a new eternal internal enemy, and maybe eternal.

00:09:34.320 --> 00:09:39.679
Over time, the face of internal enemies changed.

00:09:39.919 --> 00:09:42.240
In the Cold War it had been the communists.

00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:45.360
In the war on drugs it was the dealer and the attic.

00:09:45.759 --> 00:09:50.399
In the Age of Terror, the suspect with a foreign name and a certain kind of beard.

00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.399
Gradually another figure joined them, the immigrant.

00:09:54.720 --> 00:10:00.080
Many of the people now caught up in this system arrived seeking work or refuge.

00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:04.639
Some had crossed a line on a map without authorization.

00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:15.440
Others had overstayed their visas or fallen out of the legal status through not having their paperwork turned in on time or renew it.

00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:18.720
They became the focus of new raids and new fears.

00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:27.600
Along the southern border and in a hundred mile belt around it, a kind of constitutional light zone took place.

00:10:27.919 --> 00:10:33.600
There, checkpoints, mass stops, and searches became part of daily life.

00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:43.120
Inside the country, immigration officers conducted early morning operations at apartment complexes, factories, and churches.

00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:49.519
Families watched as parents disappeared into detention centers marked by fences and wire.

00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:52.080
So what does all this amount to?

00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:54.799
Has this been a better system or a worse system?

00:10:54.960 --> 00:10:56.080
What are the numbers?

00:10:56.320 --> 00:10:58.480
And perhaps is there some theater involved?

00:10:58.639 --> 00:11:02.480
Let's talk about Obama and Trump and get the facts.

00:11:02.639 --> 00:11:11.759
In the first decades of the twenty first century, immigration enforcement split into two distinct eras that overlapped more than they differed.

00:11:11.919 --> 00:11:18.080
Under President Barack Obama, the system became vast, quiet and highly organized.

00:11:18.799 --> 00:11:30.639
Data flowed from local jails into federal databases, enforcement priorities focused on recent border crossers, and people with certain criminal records.

00:11:30.960 --> 00:11:34.320
Dockets were streamlined, paperwork moved quickly.

00:11:34.559 --> 00:11:42.320
Year after year the government removed record numbers of people, often without cameras or crowds.

00:11:43.200 --> 00:11:46.480
For many Americans, the machinery was almost invisible.

00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:49.440
For those inside it, it was relentless.

00:11:49.759 --> 00:11:58.399
Donald Trump inherited that system and chose to change not so much the law as the performance of it.

00:11:58.559 --> 00:12:11.519
The list of priorities widened until almost anyone without the right papers could be treated as fair game, where Obama's enforcement relied heavily on screens, fingerprints, and court calendars.

00:12:11.759 --> 00:12:16.159
Trump's version stepped out into the street and onto TV.

00:12:16.399 --> 00:12:30.879
Large workplace raids returned to the nightly news, helicopters circled above neighborhoods at dawn, tactical teams in camouflage and body armor and mass appeared at doors and loading docks.

00:12:31.120 --> 00:12:37.120
Federal agents and unmarked vehicles grabbed protesters off sidewalks in American cities.

00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:41.840
The president's language made the spectacle part of the policy.

00:12:42.080 --> 00:12:46.960
Paradoxically, the results on paper moved in the opposite direction.

00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:48.879
Court backlogs grew.

00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:54.720
More people arrived with families and asylum claims that could not be resolved quickly.

00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:56.240
Policy shifted.

00:12:56.480 --> 00:12:59.440
They were challenged, and were rewritten.

00:12:59.600 --> 00:13:07.600
The total number of deportations fell below the highs of the previous Obama administration.

00:13:07.840 --> 00:13:20.240
The system became louder, more chaotic, more openly militarized, and less effective by the simple measures of how many people it actually sent away.

00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:22.080
The methods had changed.

00:13:22.320 --> 00:13:28.159
The underlying logic, a country at war with an internal enemy, that had not changed.

00:13:28.399 --> 00:13:31.600
So now today we have a militarized normal.

00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:42.720
By the time Americans entered the 2020s, the sight of heavily armed officers in helmets and vests patrolling city streets no longer seemed unusual.

00:13:42.960 --> 00:13:46.879
Vehicles designed for foreign battlefields rolled through small towns.

00:13:47.039 --> 00:13:54.080
Drones and sophisticated surveillance tools once reserved for war zones monitored domestic spaces.

00:13:54.240 --> 00:13:59.039
The accumulation of decades had created a new normal.

00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:12.320
What began as a series of exceptional measures, temporary wars, emergency powers, special courts, specialized units, formed a continuous landscape.

00:14:12.559 --> 00:14:15.919
The distinction between war and peace is now blurred.

00:14:16.080 --> 00:14:19.120
So did the line between citizen and suspect.

00:14:19.279 --> 00:14:22.559
I think we need to look at what was promised in our country.

00:14:22.799 --> 00:14:31.200
Throughout this period, public understanding of the Constitution often grew thinner even as its language was invoked more loudly.

00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:36.559
Many Americans could not even name three of the rights in the Bill of Rights.

00:14:36.879 --> 00:14:43.120
In coffee shops and comment threads online, a familiar complaint surfaced.

00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:45.440
Criminals have all the rights.

00:14:45.759 --> 00:14:52.320
The question lingered, if not the accused, then who is supposed to have rights when the state uses its power?

00:14:52.559 --> 00:14:57.600
The founding generation had answered with unusual clarity.

00:14:57.919 --> 00:15:00.639
Rights were not rewards for the virtuous.

00:15:01.120 --> 00:15:08.559
They were protections for everyone, especially when the government believed it had found a dangerous enemy within.

00:15:08.720 --> 00:15:13.600
In every era, the country has faced real threats and genuine harms.

00:15:14.080 --> 00:15:16.159
Crime rose and fell.

00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:33.039
Terror attacks occurred, borders were crossed, but alongside those realities, the nation made choices about how much power to concentrate in the hands of the state, how visible to make its force, and how widely to apply its promises.

00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:47.279
Those choices accumulated over the past thirty-five years of domestic wars tell a second story, the story of a republic that repeatedly turned the tools of militarism inward.

00:15:47.519 --> 00:15:54.639
And also it tells a story of a constitution asked again and again to stand its ground.

00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:55.919
Thank you for listening.

00:15:56.159 --> 00:16:04.879
If you enjoy this podcast, consider subscribing to our Substack or follow us, rate us on our podcast on social media.

00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:09.360
Feel free to share your viewpoints at radiofreeflint.media.

00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:18.879
This podcast that you're listening to and its essays is a production of Radio Free Flint Media LLC.

00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:19.600
Thank you.

00:16:19.759 --> 00:16:20.960
We'll see you next time.